Intro to Linters in Python: Clean and Bug-Free Code

Writing clean, error-free code is a lot easier when you have a little help. That’s where linters come in. In this post, we’ll introduce you to linters for Python, and walk through what they are, how to use them, where they came from, and why they’re so useful. We’ll also show a simple Python linting example, and cover how to integrate linters into different environments, from your local editor to CI/CD pipelines. Finally, we’ll recommend the best Python linter for beginners. Let’s get started!

1. What is a Linter?

A linter is a tool that analyzes your source code for potential errors, bugs, stylistic inconsistencies, and other issues without actually running the code. In essence, a linter serves as a helpful code reviewer that checks your work automatically. It scans through your code and flags anything that looks suspicious or out of line with best practices. This could include syntax errors, usage of undefined variables, code that doesn’t follow style guidelines, and more. By catching these issues early, linters help developers maintain code quality and avoid bugs.

Linters perform static code analysis, meaning they analyze the code’s text itself rather than executing it. They compare your code against a set of predefined rules (which often come from style guides like PEP 8 for Python, or from common bug patterns) and report any violations. Essentially, a linter will scan your source code looking for anything that could lead to problems; be it a logical error, a security vulnerability, or just messy code that’s hard to read.

The term “linter” actually comes from a 1978 tool called lint, originally written for the C programming language by Stephen C. Johnson at Bell Labs. The name was inspired by the bits of fuzz or “lint” you might find in your clothes; the lint tool’s job was to pick out the small fluff from the code, just like a lint brush picks fuzz off a sweater. Modern linters apply the same idea to code: they act like a “lint trap,” catching little errors and bad patterns while leaving your actual code logic intact.

To sum up, a linter is your automated code quality assistant. It helps you write cleaner, more reliable code by pointing out mistakes or deviations from standards. Next, let’s see a linter in action with a simple Python example.

2. Simple Python Example of a Linter

Nothing beats a hands-on example to illustrate how linters work. In this section, we’ll use a popular Python linter (we’ll use Flake8 for our demo) to check a simple script. We’ll first write a tiny Python program that has a few style issues, run the linter to see what it catches, then fix the code and run the linter again to verify that it’s clean.

Step 1: Write a simple Python script with some issues. For example, create a file example.py with the following content:

# example.py (with some linting issues)
def add(a,b):return a+b
x=add(1,2)
print(x)

At first glance, this script is very short and it does work (if you run it, it will print 3). However, it’s not following Python’s standard style guidelines (PEP 8), and it has some problems that a linter will flag:

• The function definition def add(a,b):return a+b is all on one line. According to style conventions, after the : you should put the function body on a new line (and indent it). Also, there should be a space after each comma, and spaces around the + operator.

• The assignment x=add(1,2) is also missing spaces around the = and after the comma.

• There’s no blank line after the function definition, which is recommended for top-level functions.

Step 2: Run the linter on this script. Assuming you have Flake8 installed (we’ll cover installation in a bit), you can run it from the command line:

flake8 example.py

The linter will analyze the file and output any issues it finds. For our script, you might see output like this:

example.py:1:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 0
example.py:1:5: E231 missing whitespace after ','
example.py:1:12: E225 missing whitespace around operator
example.py:1:13: E704 multiple statements on one line (def)
example.py:2:2: E225 missing whitespace around operator

Let’s break down what these messages mean:

• example.py:1:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 0 – This is telling us that at line 1, column 1, we violated rule E302, which expects 2 blank lines before a top-level function definition. In other words, we should have two blank lines above the def add line (this is a PEP 8 style guideline for code organization).

• example.py:1:5: E231 missing whitespace after ',' – At line 1, column 5, we have def add(a,b). The linter expected a space after the comma in the parameter list (a, b). It’s flagging the missing space.

• example.py:1:12: E225 missing whitespace around operator – At line 1, column 12, which is around the a+b part, we’re missing spaces around the + operator. We should write a + b instead of a+b.

• example.py:1:13: E704 multiple statements on one line (def) – This indicates that we put multiple statements on one line in a def. Indeed, we had the function definition and the return statement on the same line. The linter prefers each statement on its own line for clarity (so the return should go on its own indented line).

• example.py:2:2: E225 missing whitespace around operator – At line 2, column 2, the linter found x=add(1,2). It specifically flags the = (assignment) here for missing surrounding whitespace (it wants x = add(1, 2)). It’s essentially the same kind of issue (E225) we saw before, but on the second line.

Note: The codes like E302, E231, etc., correspond to specific rules in the PEP 8 style guide. Linters like Flake8 use these codes to categorize the type of issue. You don’t need to memorize them – when you see a linter message, you can look up what the code means. For example, E225 is a whitespace issue. Over time, you’ll get familiar with common ones.

As you can see, the linter has caught several issues in our tiny script that might seem trivial, but fixing them will make our code cleaner and more in line with standard Python practices. None of these are runtime “bugs” (the script still produces the correct result), but addressing them will improve the code’s readability and maintainability.

Step 3: Fix the linting errors. Let’s rewrite our example.py to address the linter’s feedback:

# example.py (fixed version)
def add(a, b):
    return a + b

x = add(1, 2)
print(x)

What changed:

• We added blank lines before and after the function definition (to satisfy the E302 rule about separation).

• In the function definition, we put the return on a new line and indented it, properly structuring the function.

• We added a space after the comma in the parameter list, and around the + in the return statement.

• In the call add(1, 2), we added spaces after the comma and around the = assignment.

These might seem like small tweaks, but they make the code much easier to read at a glance. Now, if we run flake8 example.py again, ideally we should get no output, which means the linter found no issues. No news is good news! 🎉 (If there were still any warnings, the linter would list them; an empty result indicates the code passes all the checks.)

Through this example, you can see how a linter acts as a guide. It points out parts of the code that, while not outright errors, could be improved. By following the linter’s suggestions, we cleaned up our code. This reduces the chance of mistakes and makes the code more uniform – which is very helpful when working in a team or on larger projects.

3. Benefits of Using Linters

Why should you use a linter? As we’ve hinted, linters offer a lot of advantages that can make your life as a developer easier and your software better. Here are some key benefits of incorporating linters into your workflow:

• Catch Errors Early: Linters help you spot mistakes before running your code or pushing changes. They can detect syntax errors, undefined variables, or wrong function calls early on. This means fewer surprises and bugs when you or your team actually execute the code. Finding bugs early leads to fewer errors in production, saving you from potential headaches down the line.

• Improved Code Readability: By enforcing a consistent style, linters make code more readable and uniform across a project. This consistency is not just aesthetic; it makes it easier for you and others to read and understand the code. The result is clean code that’s easily understandable and maintainable. When every developer follows the same guidelines, you spend less time deciphering formatting and more time focusing on what the code does.

• Maintainability and Fewer Bugs: Linters encourage best practices that often correlate with better-designed code. For example, a linter might warn about a function that’s too complex or a module that has grown too large. Addressing these can improve the design and maintainability of your software. Moreover, by catching “code smells” (patterns that often lead to bugs), linters help reduce the number of defects that make it into the codebase.

• Enforcing Coding Standards: In a team setting, it’s common to have a coding standard like PEP 8 for Python. Linters automatically enforce many of these rules, so you don’t have to remember every little detail. This leads to fewer discussions or arguments about code style during code reviews, because the linter already handles those disagreements objectively. Code reviews can then focus on logic and design rather than spaces and commas.

• Consistent Style = Less Cognitive Load: It might not be obvious at first, but if every piece of code in a project looks consistent, it’s easier to switch between different parts of the codebase. Inconsistent style can distract the reader; consistent style lets you focus on the actual logic. Linters help achieve that consistency by flagging deviations from the agreed style.

• Educational for Developers: Especially if you’re a newcomer to a language or to programming, linters are great teachers. They’ll point out things you might not know. For instance, a linter might warn about an unused variable or a deprecated function. This can educate developers about common pitfalls and best practices. Over time, you’ll start writing cleaner code from the start, having learned from past linter feedback.

• Reduction of Technical Debt: By maintaining code quality and consistency, linters help prevent the build-up of “technical debt,” i.e., those postponed clean-ups and fixes that make code hard to work with later. A linter keeps you accountable to clean code standards as you go, so you’re less likely to accumulate a mess that needs refactoring.

• Better Code Review and Collaboration: Since linters catch the simple issues automatically, human code reviewers can concentrate on more complex aspects of the code. This makes code reviews more productive and collaborative. It’s much more helpful to discuss architecture and logic in a code review than to nitpick where a space is missing, and linters ensure a lot of that nitpicking is already done.

In short, using linters leads to code that is more reliable, readable, and maintainable. It can improve your team’s productivity and confidence in the code. Linters act as an automated “quality gate,” ensuring that only code meeting a certain standard makes it through. As a bonus, they often make you a better programmer by highlighting patterns to avoid.

Next, let’s talk about how to actually use these linters in different scenarios, from checking a single file on your computer to integrating linting into an entire project’s development workflow.

4. Using Linters in Different Environments

Linters are flexible tools and can be used in various stages of development. Here we’ll cover three common scenarios for using Python linters:

• On a Local File: You’re writing a script or module on your machine and want to lint it.

• On a Code Repository: You want to enforce linting on an entire codebase or repository (perhaps for all developers on a project).

• In a CI/CD Pipeline: You integrate linting into your continuous integration process, so it runs automatically on commits or pull requests.

Each environment has a slightly different setup, but they usually use the same linter underneath. We’ll continue using Flake8 as our example linter in these scenarios, but other linters would be set up in a similar way.

On a Local File

Using a linter on a local file is the simplest case. You can do so during development, either right after or while you are writing code.

Step 1: Install a Python linter. Linters are usually available as Python packages. For example, to install Flake8 you can use pip:

pip install flake8

This will download and install Flake8 on your system.

Step 2: Run the linter on your code. Once installed, you can run the linter from the command line. To lint a single file, you can provide the filename. For instance:

flake8 my_script.py

This will run Flake8 on my_script.py and print any issues it finds. If there are no issues, it will silently return to the prompt. If there are problems, you’ll see output as we saw in the earlier example.

You can also lint an entire directory or project. By default, running flake8 in a folder will recursively check all .py files in that folder and subfolders. For example, if you have a project directory, you can simply cd into it and run:

flake8 .

The dot . tells Flake8 to lint the current directory. This will effectively scan all Python files in your project for issues. This is great for doing a quick quality check on a whole codebase.

Step 3: Review and fix issues. The linter’s output will guide you to the files and lines that need attention. Open those files in your editor, make the recommended changes, and run the linter again until you get a clean bill of health.

Bonus: Editor Integration: Running the linter manually is fine, but many modern code editors can run linters automatically as you write code. For example, Visual Studio Code, PyCharm, Sublime Text, and others have plugins or settings to integrate linters. In VS Code, you can select a linter and it will underline issues in your code as you save the file. It feels like having a spell-checker for code: mistakes get underlined in real-time. This instant feedback can speed up your development cycle, because you notice and fix issues on the fly rather than after writing a lot of code. If you hover over an underlined issue in VS Code or PyCharm, it will show you the linter’s message about what’s wrong. Setting this up typically involves enabling the linter in your editor’s settings; often just a checkbox or command palette action to enable linting.

Overall, using a linter locally is straightforward: install it, run it on your code, and iterate. Now, let’s move to applying linting at a larger scale.

On a Code Repository

When working on a project with multiple files or multiple contributors, you’ll want to enforce linting across the entire codebase, not just one file. This ensures consistency and quality for the whole project. There are a few tips for using linters effectively in a repository context:

Project-Wide Linting: As mentioned, you can lint the whole repo by running flake8 . at the root of the project. Many teams include this in their development process, so that before code is merged, someone runs the linter on the entire project to catch any issues. It’s common to set up a short script or makefile target like make lint that runs the linter with the appropriate options on the repo.

Configuration Files: In a larger project, you might have some custom linting rules or want to ignore certain warnings. Rather than typing a bunch of command-line options every time, you can use a config file for the linter. Flake8, for instance, supports configuration in files like setup.cfg, tox.ini, or a .flake8 file. You can specify things like the maximum line length, or tell the linter to ignore certain rules . For example, here’s a snippet of what a Flake8 config in setup.cfg might look like:

[flake8]
max-line-length = 88
extend-ignore = 
    E302,  # ignore “expected 2 blank lines” rule
per-file-ignores = 
    tests/*:E501  # ignore long line warnings in files under tests/

(The above is an example configuration that sets a max line length of 88 characters, ignores the blank line rule E302 globally, and ignores the long-line rule E501 in test files.)

This configuration would be picked up by Flake8 when run in the project, so it tailors the linting to your project’s needs. Pylint similarly allows a .pylintrc file to configure its checks. Using a config file is highly recommended for repositories, so that everyone running the linter is on the same page and the rules don’t vary from machine to machine.

Pre-commit Hooks: A common way to ensure that all code committed to a repository is linted is to use git hooks, specifically a pre-commit hook. Tools like pre-commit (a framework for managing these hooks) can automate running linters every time a developer tries to make a commit. If the linter finds issues, the commit can be aborted, prompting the developer to fix things before they even push their code. For example, Flake8 can be integrated as a pre-commit hook. By adding a .pre-commit-config.yaml file to your repo with Flake8 listed, developers who enable pre-commit will automatically run Flake8 on changed files at commit time. This way, you catch problems early and consistently, and it becomes virtually impossible to commit code that doesn’t pass linting.

Documentation and Enforcement: It’s good to document in your project’s README that a linter is being used, and how to run it. Encourage all contributors to run the linter and set up the pre-commit. In some cases, teams choose to fail the build or reject a pull request if the code doesn’t meet linting standards.

In summary, using linters in a repository context means making linting a standard part of the development workflow for that project. It might involve a bit of setup, but it pays off by keeping the codebase clean and uniform.

In a CI/CD Pipeline

To take linting to the next level, you can integrate it into your Continuous Integration (CI) or Continuous Delivery (CD) pipeline. This means every time code is pushed to the repository, the CI system automatically runs the linter (among other tests) to ensure the code meets quality standards. If the linter finds issues, the CI job can fail, which alerts developers to fix the problems before the code can be merged or deployed.

Why integrate into CI? It provides an automated, consistent check. Humans might forget to run the linter locally, but the CI never forgets. It acts as a gatekeeper: no code gets into the main branch without passing linting.

Most CI systems like GitHub Actions and GitLab CI can easily run linters since it’s just a command-line task. Let’s consider an example with GitHub Actions:

You would create a workflow file (YAML format) in .github/workflows/ (for example, python-lint.yml). In that file, you can specify a job that sets up Python and runs the linter. Here’s a simplified example of how a lint job might look:

name: Lint Code

on: [push, pull_request]  # Run on every push and PR

jobs:
  lint:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3  # Check out the repository code
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v4
        with:
          python-version: "3.x"
      - name: Install Flake8
        run: pip install flake8
      - name: Run Flake8
        run: flake8 .

This CI configuration will automatically install Flake8 and run it on the entire repository (flake8 .) whenever someone pushes code or opens a Pull Request on GitHub. If Flake8 finds any issues (and returns a non-zero exit status), the job will fail, and GitHub will show a red X for the lint check. This notifies the developers that something needs fixing. Only when the code is lint-clean will the lint job pass (green checkmark). You can even make passing the lint job a requirement to merge a PR.

The above example is basic – in real projects you might add more options. In most cases, though, teams keep it simple: run the linter, and fail the build on any issues. This ensures code quality is maintained.

Summary of CI integration: By hooking linters into CI, you ensure that no matter where code comes from, it gets checked. It’s like having an automated gatekeeper for code quality. This leads to a consistently clean main branch, and it saves reviewers time. It’s a one-time setup that pays dividends on every commit.

5. Which Python Linter?

Finally, you might be wondering: Which Python linter should I use? There are a few popular ones, and each has its strengths. The best choice can depend on your needs, but for most developers a good option to start with is Flake8.

Flake8 is often recommended as an excellent Python linter for several reasons:

• Ease of Use: Flake8 is simple to install and run, with minimal configuration needed to get started. As we demonstrated, you can just pip install flake8 and start linting. It doesn’t overwhelm newcomers with too much output unless there are actual issues to fix.

• Combination of Checks: Flake8 is actually a “wrapper” that combines three tools: PyFlakes (which checks for logical errors like undefined names), pycodestyle (which checks for PEP8 style violations), and McCabe (which checks code complexity). This means Flake8 gives you a nice spread of checks: from finding real bugs to enforcing style and identifying overly complex code. You get a lot of bang for your buck.

• Low False Positives: Flake8 tends to be practical; it focuses on issues that are likely to be real problems or violations. It usually doesn’t throw tons of unnecessary warnings. In fact, Flake8 is known to be pretty accurate and produces a low number of false positives. This is important because as a beginner, you want tools that signal real issues, not flood you with noise.

• Configurability: While easy by default, Flake8 can be configured for advanced use. You can ignore specific rules or adjust settings easily via config files. This flexibility means it can adapt as your needs grow, without becoming a hindrance.

• Speed: Flake8 is fairly fast and lightweight, which matters when you integrate it in your development workflow or CI. It’s not the absolute fastest (there are newer tools like Ruff which are blazing fast), but Flake8 is quick enough for most projects and runs faster than more heavy-duty tools like Pylint.

• Community Support: Flake8 is widely used in the Python community. You’ll find plenty of documentation, tutorials, and community plugins. There are many plugins available to extend Flake8’s functionality. Because of its popularity, if you run into any issue or have a question, a quick web search will likely find an answer. It’s also regularly maintained as part of the Python Code Quality Authority (PyCQA) projects.

In the end, the “best” linter is one that you and your team will actually use consistently. Flake8’s simplicity encourages regular use, helping you to develop good habits and keeps your Python code tidy and error-free.

Conclusion: Linters might initially seem like strict teachers, but they truly are friends of every developer. They automate the nitpicky parts of code review, prevent bugs, and keep your codebase healthy. Whether you’re writing a small script or working on a large application, incorporating a linter into your workflow will pay off with cleaner code and more confidence in your software’s quality. So go ahead, give linting a try in your next Python project.

Want more step-by-step advice on setting up linters for your coding projects? Caparra is here to help. Click the button below to get tactical advice from our DevOps-focused chatbot: